返回列表 回復 發帖
13# markhamwong 用作參考!現用 TOKINA AT-X 10-17MM NIKON,很好用,如用
TOKINA AT-X 11-16MM F2.8 NIKON大光圏,用途大好多。看看魚鏡多樂趣!!!            
附件: 您所在的用戶組無法下載或查看附件
哈哈 ... 好毒啊!
15# WuSoLo
Looks like there is a lot of fun using the fisheye lens. But
Look at these......
TOKINA-AT-X-11-16MM-F2-8-NIKON-II           C$999
TOKINA-AT-X-11-16MM-F2-8-NIKON               C$780
TOKINA-AT-X-10-17MM-NIKON-FISHEYE-NH    C$770.
Do I really need a fisheye lens? or a Wide 11-16 shoul be more suitable?
I am using a Nikon D7000 with 18-300 zoom lens. (=27-450mm)
What do you think?
本帖最後由 markhamwong 於 2013-1-24 10:15 AM 編輯

16# mauho
Thanks
I only want to buy one lens. Which one you think I should go for?
By the way. These picture are so sharp. TOKINA is that good?
18# markhamwong

想問一下你的 Nikon 原廠相片處理軟件可以將魚眼的變形做修正嗎?

可以的就買魚眼鏡吧,不能的就選第二代的吧。
19# markhamwong TOKINA +Nikon機是OK,你最好自己帶機去相機店試試,拍相看看,還有外型及手感也很重要,還有找ニ手玩玩也可,便宜很多。希望我個人意見幫到你。
nice one!
很漂亮,万道金光!!
nice photo
謝謝分享...
21# mauho
I have try a few lenses.
NIKON AF-S 14-24 F2.8 G ED
SIGMA 10-20MM 4-5.6 EX DC NIKON HSM
TOKINA AT-X 11-16MM F2.8 NIKON II
and my own NIKON AF-S DX 18-300 F3.5-5.6 ED VR LENS
No Tokina fisheye to test. (no stock)
To me, looks like the Nikon 18-300 I like the most.
Tokina is the blurest picture but very bright.
Sigma is not bad but not as sharp and bright as Nikon.
Nikon 14-24 F2.8 is over price and not than better.
I tested with my D7000 same setting with no tripod. Hand held the camera.
26# markhamwong

試了三支相約的鏡頭,心中有數了吧!

不過,在這三支鏡頭中,好像 Sigma 是可以配合全片幅 ( FF ) 來使同的,Tokina 因為沒接觸過所以不知;但 Nikon 的就不可以了 (有錯請更正 );這因素也是考慮日後升級的一大重點。
Nice shot !!

Thank you for sharing this golden hour photo!!!
nice photos! Thanks for sharing!
很喜歡這些光線.

16樓, 原來魚鏡這麼好玩
返回列表