l0709394

1=5 already violates the basic arithmatics,
- }; N$ w! p7 w& U9 y0 cwithout the basic arithmatics, we can not even say 5=1 because we dont know if = sign is commutative, therefore, 5=3125 is an answer that follows the pattern well1 }; l4 Q; c0 B, o1 b

# V) r: u0 b& v# p6 \公仔箱論壇anyway, what is more important is the lessen behind this question