原帖由 nitz 於 2008-2-4 11:15 AM 發表 
* v. l2 N7 c1 m6 @$ r W佢地影得就預左無c隱...(俾當事人睇返)
! {" B9 z1 Z7 H2 Y* Q* {1 N不過無義務俾晒廣大市民睇lor...
9 E; n3 o! T, q% ~: {2 A; C偷野果個一定係唔arm ga喇..
* |7 G, n* V d, z7 C; s0 RI am totally 120% supporting the above.公仔箱論壇, Z' e; T; c* z' Q* D% w
Everyone in HK had their own rights to do whatever they want in their home as long as their action is not affecting the public. (By-law act)
' K/ X9 e3 W! X! sThis is hard to define from this point But the leakage of the stolen information is definatly WRONG.
/ n! Z4 t: P3 E& B; W% a! kI believe the HK police is acting quickly to arrest the person who release the stolen information is base on the common criminal act if someone call the police for the stolen information.
m- f$ h6 n% k! o9 k" b/ b7 _7 E2 utvb now,tvbnow,bttvbNo questions ask. I don't understand why people acting so senitive for such a normal proceduce. Morover, those arrested people will be judge on court...5.39.217.77:8898. I& K" Y9 g7 m! H2 X
Okay back to the question... 您地覺得 <裸照風波> 最大罪係邊個... Who is the most guility one?5.39.217.77:88985 B1 Z1 O' ?# x7 H
From the criminial act : the one who post up the stolen information
: t A* ~5 y% h- t( Y9 C& ?公仔箱論壇From the moral side: the one who create this nude pictures. |
發表於 2008-2-11 01:41 AM
| 