公仔箱論壇 - Powered by Discuz! Board

標題: BOSE 的speaker [打印本頁]

作者: playlord 時間: 2009-6-23 03:20 PM 標題: BOSE 的speaker

小弟自己是用古董級的BOSE 301;

各位師兄對BOSE 的speaker有什麼評價呢?

作者: austin500 時間: 2009-6-25 01:26 PM

一个字靓啊

作者: carwing 時間: 2009-6-26 01:02 PM

之前買左套V20
點知用左無2個月個主機就神左

作者: orchids 時間: 2009-6-26 10:07 PM

brand Bose is noble hi fi plaything.its design and outlook is very brilliant but the sound is not so hi fi.actually it is those millionare's plaything.

作者: bbnikki 時間: 2009-6-27 05:44 PM

It is one of good choose for bookselves speaker

作者: brian123 時間: 2009-6-29 05:51 AM

本帖最後由 brian123 於 2009-6-29 06:18 AM 編輯

brand Bose is noble hi fi plaything.its design and outlook is very brilliant but the sound is not so hi fi.actually it is those millionare's plaything.
orchids 發表於 2009-6-26 10:07 PM

for good sound, this speaker from germany is very, very good...is teufel, maybe it say you not...look look la..i use teufel too, before i i had use canton..
here a exp.
[attach]688478[/attach]

LT 6 THX Select....€ 2799,00

作者: chantommy 時間: 2009-6-29 10:27 PM

好正，推薦給大家！

作者: playlord 時間: 2009-6-30 10:33 PM

brand Bose is noble hi fi plaything.its design and outlook is very brilliant but the sound is not so hi fi.actually it is those millionare's plaything.
orchids 發表於 2009-6-26 10:07 PM

在上年小弟換了現在的二手Bose speaker;

但是感覺卻是並沒有太大改進;
--------當然,隨了speaker外, hi fi 是要有許多地方來配合,
但是似乎是性價比不配合.............

作者: jerry87 時間: 2009-6-30 11:35 PM

除了靓之外我读不知道要讲什么

作者: ml342 時間: 2009-7-2 07:29 AM

bose is nice but not a good hi fi for real hi fi person

作者: sampsonhee 時間: 2009-7-3 04:04 PM

bose 也是很好只是不是最好的。。。

作者: kc_calvinhk 時間: 2009-7-7 03:13 AM

it's ok, but it's not good enough for musical

作者: eyan777007 時間: 2009-7-7 11:28 AM

301一般性，看你派什么用

作者: 輝哥 時間: 2009-7-9 03:32 PM

推薦俾大家

作者: chachachachacha 時間: 2009-7-13 11:06 PM

本帖最後由 chachachachacha 於 2009-7-13 11:11 PM 編輯

I have the 301 Music Monitor II. Not really the vintage model as yours I guess. Mine is in well-built quality. They were made in Canada.
The direct-reflect technology was quite an innovation that time, it makes the sould more 3-D and layered.

Personally they are good for rock-n-roll and pop music. Not really a good choice for bright sound instruments (harp, acoustic guitar, fife, xylophone) and vocals.

作者: wezg 時間: 2009-7-14 08:58 AM

bose is the good speaker, but are there someone know about the Matrix speakers

作者: uilim233 時間: 2009-7-14 05:03 PM

if using high n hi fi need use original audio or original video with good quality.

作者: speedlin 時間: 2009-7-15 10:31 PM

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: stevten 時間: 2009-7-23 02:59 PM

good.......

作者: stevten 時間: 2009-7-23 03:02 PM

Thank for sharing!

作者: 天使流星 時間: 2009-7-24 06:21 PM

吾错啊......

作者: mxm 時間: 2009-7-31 10:59 PM

VERY GOOD I ALSO BAY

作者: jai911 時間: 2009-8-2 05:44 AM

I have been using (or may be bought) Bose Acoustimass 10 for 13 years. It sounds OK, the whole reason I bouht it is because of its size and looks. If I would replace the speakers, I would go for B&W or Dynaudio. But if I am forced to buy bose again, I would save up and go for 901. To me, BOSE 901 is extreme ugly and does not fit any room at all, but it sounds really good.

作者: anthony3n 時間: 2009-8-18 05:31 AM

性價比麻麻
bass 太重
唔係我杯茶

歡迎光臨公仔箱論壇 (http://5.39.217.77:8898/)