+ V1 `, |5 B' N, o, A- n由「67暴動」到「97回歸」的30年，香港創造了一個繁榮盛世，不是因為英國給了香港什麼優惠。當年原來主宰香港經濟的是英資大財團，但港英政府沒有固執地只維護它們的利益，反而是順應形勢讓後起的華資逐漸坐大。香港人既勤勞又聰明，在自由的空間內創造了經濟奇蹟。TVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。; M5 H0 j4 |4 i. R E% i! l- h
5.39.217.77:88987 w/ s$ F2 w9 Q, {! f* \
香港能否成功落實「一國兩制、港人治港」，其關鍵條件也正是香港人有沒有自由的空間管治自己的地方。可是，回歸後北京並沒有給香港人這個空間，每一次都要代我們選擇特首。特區政府表現差勁，北京仍然要香港人支持這個政府，同時自己介入香港事務更深，以為自己可以管好香港。現在香港變成一團糟，原因是香港人不爭氣、「反中亂港」者攪局、特區政府不濟事、工商界不積極、外國勢力介入搞破壞等等。但北京從來沒有檢視過自己對港政策的失誤。北京所有為香港做的決定都是正確的，都不應亦不能改變。這正是目前香港困局的主要成因。5.39.217.77:8898; @2 S) k9 Z) U3 H1 E/ q
0 C y, G" X, G8 p. M
2 w8 G7 |8 t1 X8 _TVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。盼風華正茂的他們走出危機的困局 ; C; e" p# _, P& V& K4 OTVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。 5 q/ m8 z, C2 C- M. L公仔箱論壇如果中共所有決定都對，內地就不會有「反右」，不會有「大躍進」，更不會有「文革」。鄧小平對中國的卓越貢獻，正正在於他在上世紀70年代末敢於面對共產黨的錯誤，撥亂反正。簡單的說，他的改革政策的核心思想就是向人民放權，讓中國人民尋找改善生活的方法。一個正確的戰略決策，換取到中國幾十年的持續高速增長。: H7 C. c7 ~' Z+ C
tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb# _' W' F6 G2 [9 S
所以香港並不存在什麼撕裂的問題，其深層次矛盾亦並非關乎梁振英個人怎麼想、泛民怎麼想、學生領導人怎麼想。解決矛盾的主動權在北京，但香港人如果不想做沉默的羔羊，也唯有堅持發聲。而這是當前僵局的要害。香港人的堅持令人敬佩，但如果北京不願意撥亂反正，這種堅持亦使政治危機持續升級。我們愛惜下一代，希望風華正茂的他們能夠走出危機的困局，做社會的主人翁，主宰未來香港的沉浮。我亦以此作為告別筆陣的願望。tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb5 P& i: d+ q# U$ Z5 t: j+ A- V1 {/ z* S
tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb4 J+ @( |- P! {: @: r# {& x
（告別語：我在1986年開始在《明報》撰文，在1987年1月加入明報的新聞團隊，是我離開學院後的第一份工作。上述一切要多謝吳靄儀女士和查良鏞先生。在明報工作及其後長期撰稿的20多年中，有幸認識了很多傑出的新聞工作者，在他們身上學習了很多，在此一併答謝。我要特別多謝張健波兄，長期撥出明報篇幅為我的拙見提供空間。他退休是新聞界的一大損失，但作為朋友，我衷心祝願他身心康泰。新陳代謝是社會正常規律。兩個星期前我在本欄說：長江後浪推前浪。我相信：我告別筆陣後，讀者會讀到其他作者更精彩的文章。） 7 S% F# ^( a; _2 l4 R5.39.217.77:88980 v2 f9 d4 C) a6 l& t 盧子健公共事務顧問作者: felicity2010 時間: 2014-10-29 07:31 AM
本帖最後由 felicity2010 於 2014-10-29 07:34 AM 編輯 1 k/ e( h( J" \* ^tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb 1 O4 ^, ~* U- ?tvb now,tvbnow,bttvbChris Patten: Hope for Hong Kong ! L) M8 _, }3 c% TTVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。 4 E2 K0 d/ {& U9 Stvb now,tvbnow,bttvbTVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。+ W4 {1 u1 q2 A
LONDON –Hong Kong’s democracy movement has gained admiration worldwide. The principles,decency, and behavior of its youthful vanguard inspire confidence in the qualities of the generation that one day will run the great city. That said, it is time to move on to a sensible endgame.TVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。$ z9 R9 R8 K9 s3 ?" H
* l) k2 x7 b F+ f公仔箱論壇The longer the standoff between Hong Kong’s Chief Executive and the demonstrators continues, the more likely it is that individual citizens – and Hong Kong itself – will be hurt. The Hong Kong government should demonstrate some statesmanship, which the so-called “Umbrella Movement” – occupying the moral high ground and not wishing to risk losing public support – would surely reciprocate. A substantive and successful dialogue with the government would not require the protesters to call off their campaign for democracy; it would simply end the current phase of a campaign that eventually will succeed.5.39.217.77:88987 z- V d3 `1 z2 c1 M
5.39.217.77:88982 q/ ^0 g/ Q2 q' s. Y
Despite their protestations to the contrary, Hong Kong Chief Executive C. Y. Leung and his government have considerable room for maneuver. As many Hong Kong citizens have argued, the Chinese government’s current position is based on a report,submitted by Leung’s officials, which purported to reflect accurately the outcome of local consultations on constitutional development.tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb: P! d$ n- Z7 d" q [
! l- T2 m6 l# C1 g2 Z5.39.217.77:8898But the report plainly understated the degree of public support for change. Given what has happened in the last few weeks, Leung could quite properly give a new report to the authorities in Beijing focusing on two issues not proscribed by Hong Kong’s mini-constitution, the Basic Law.公仔箱論壇$ f' R# i+ ^/ H4 g7 e0 |8 G: X
2 v0 m+ C. `' Q. U( \; B# L; ^The first issue concerns not just the immediate question of the terms on which the Chief Executive will be elected in 2017, but also how the Legislative Council should be elected in 2016 and after. The procedure is largely a matter for the Hong Kong government to decide. # i& G; P# e/ Q; Z% uTVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。 - Z7 ^- @( y) S1 Ntvb now,tvbnow,bttvbIt is surprising that 17 years after the handover of sovereignty from the United Kingdom to China, Hong Kong still does not have a directly elected legislature.In December 1992, Margaret Thatcher suggested in a speech in the House of Lords that, if all went well, Hong Kong could have universal suffrage by 2007.5.39.217.77:8898" d( v* r! m" k* z9 j4 D' l
" V4 H6 w2 j/ Z8 X9 iUnfortunately,all has not gone well. The legislature today comprises a mix of directly elected members and those representing functional constituencies: corporate interests and groups of employees. Some civic groups have advocated increasing the number of directly elected legislators and opening up the functional constituencies to broader electorates. Moreover, the brake that the functional constituencies can put on legislation should be scrapped, leaving decisions to a simple majority. This could be accompanied by a pledge to create a legislature composed entirely of directly elected members in 2020.( R" t, [- I9 W( Y- ?
tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb0 |% K" t: F& c* y" p$ Z/ S- @
The second issue concerns the composition and the voting rules of the handpicked1,200-member election committee that will choose the Chief Executive in the future. The current proposed arrangements would permit the Chinese government to veto any candidate that it did not like, prompting criticism that what is on offer is an Iranian-style election: “You can vote for anyone we choose.”TVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。' j6 D1 H5 x& R$ Y
5.39.217.77:8898+ X% I* d3 k, Q- o- e6 i
The Hong Kong government could call for changes to increase the openness and fairness by which the Chief Executive is chosen, without abandoning its current method in favor of universal suffrage. According to the Basic Law, the election committee should be “broadly representative” – a provision that the committee’s current composition violates. Its membership is chosen by only 7% of the total Hong Kong electorate, and its voting procedures seek to prevent the nomination of any candidates who may harbor democratic sympathies.+ J) y( x! O% g& l
0 S3 `8 J! V: u: e" K' u' a
Since 1997,55-61% of voters have voted for democratic candidates in Legislative Council elections. The last time a slightly smaller election committee met (to choose Leung), less restrictive constraints on candidate selection were in place, and the leader of the Democratic Party was able to be nominated (though he still received less than 7% of the vote).tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb! R, F2 c, i1 \
( @. u$ O5 g) R8 W$ gTVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。So Leung and his team should put forward proposals to broaden the electoral base of the election committee and open up the nominating process for candidates. There are plenty of recommendations from civil-society groups about how to accomplish these objectives. Both sides will need to give a little to prevent the confrontation in the streets from escalating, with the police forced to provide a substitute for a sensible policy. 3 j& `& ~" {: P# B6 K" utvb now,tvbnow,bttvb- F3 @0 `: ^& M1 p
The British government has said that it is important that “the people of Hong Kong have a genuine choice.” Leung and his colleagues can give them one. This would not be all that the Umbrella Movement has demanded, but it should encourage the protesters to reach a compromise without departing from their longer-term goal. 3 Y k! D4 H( n: s5.39.217.77:8898That is why Leung should embrace dialogue and compromise. Even a ruler whose mandate comes from heaven should heed the words of the Confucian sage Mencius: “Heaven sees with the eyes of its people. Heaven hears with the ears of its people.” / S- Y( l2 R6 ? q7 U公仔箱論壇 o1 n' F. v; A; ttvb now,tvbnow,bttvbtvb now,tvbnow,bttvb8 C* J5 M% q1 b4 O8 z! ^ 作者: felicity2010 時間: 2014-10-29 07:45 AM
