7 z# I# Q7 b6 @( q. Y- R5.39.217.77:88983.我們可以澄清，我們相信有無辜的當事人牽涉其中，並且 可能包括像您一樣列名為合作者之人。 8 e8 |, z" r7 W }/ d3 s9 I# s$ otvb now,tvbnow,bttvb # U- }$ s& f0 o1 V6 a5 |tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb（We can confirm that these papers have not been retracted as a result of plagiarism. We cannot comment on the content and quality of the retracted papers, due to the fact that they were not assessedin line with appropriate and correct/ quality peerreview standards.5.39.217.77:88985 J( c, N$ O; x4 a+ w
: [- m% h @8 X5 w8 a) w# |1 x
We are able to clarify that we believe there are innocent parties involved and which may include many of those listed as co-authors such as yourself.）5.39.217.77:88988 t% r; a# } H( o) K- J& ~
TVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。6 I1 T1 {, _$ m& ?
二、此外，SAGE公司之回信中亦提到，「不幸的是，提交稿件的作者並未提供您正確的聯絡電子郵件位址，因此看來您沒有收到本公司寄給所有作者的信件有關通知撤回一事。」公仔箱論壇- E9 B8 x) m4 v ^4 {3 w0 I
6 s8 j6 ? G4 t; i（Unfortunately the submitting author on your manuscripts did not provide an accurate contactemail address for you on the papers and therefore itappears that you did not receive the correspondencewhich was sent to all author and co-authorsnotifying you of the retractions.）- e/ W" P" }! j9 Y2 A9 m6 ~
5.39.217.77:88989 B* W/ d) F+ ?
因此可見期刊通知確未送達及向本人求證，自然也沒有本人明知或不處理之情事。學術聲譽累積不易，對學者而言，可謂第二生命，外界在相關事實未釐明前，不應輕易論斷本人為共同作者之論文有實質違反學術倫理或抄襲造假之情事。 6 a3 \; a' S) f; b) Itvb now,tvbnow,bttvbtvb now,tvbnow,bttvb4 [' z$ ~8 `9 g1 c3 e$ s
三、本人希望科技部能儘快查明此一事件，還本人及研究團隊其他成員一個公道。
