Board logo

標題: 新力愛立信 w910 比 w580 [打印本頁]

作者: 老弟    時間: 2007-10-30 09:14 PM     標題: 新力愛立信 w910 比 w580

我要买新电话~tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb0 d2 c9 i' A3 c5 C: H
你们给点意见吧~tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb- |' a: {2 G& b% u3 s
w910
) ^" G1 m0 }6 _# ]5.39.217.77:8898[attach]164479[/attach]5.39.217.77:88982 l' w% g! ~. b6 e/ Y
w580) t& i4 p, y, U! T+ Z/ o2 a
[attach]164480[/attach]
作者: 5207603    時間: 2007-10-30 09:18 PM

w580外形更好看!不过~怎的只能买se的机子 ?
作者: 老弟    時間: 2007-10-30 09:21 PM

我在二选一
作者: lordchoon    時間: 2007-10-30 11:37 PM

w910:onion31:
作者: telestarcom    時間: 2007-10-31 02:05 PM

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: 7489    時間: 2007-11-2 07:16 PM

w580:014: :014:
作者: anson828    時間: 2007-11-2 11:14 PM

W91o0 will be a better phone...W580's design is more sporting but 910 more classical...Overall oso W910 better.
! j9 j0 \" J+ c公仔箱論壇got 3G,screen bigger...If I was u,i wil buy 910...but the consideration tat u shud think is the price...910 more
- ?4 x1 G" X2 o# I$ p% @5 k2 W4 N5.39.217.77:8898expensive
作者: Ryuu    時間: 2007-11-6 03:27 PM

The w910i is better than the w580i in every way except the price and the call/end call buttons -_-. I think they look ugly.
6 C# y4 n4 T2 M2 ~& ^: W/ X5 W5.39.217.77:8898公仔箱論壇' S1 [' q) u( H" Q' E& E% ~( Y- G9 R
But if you're going to buy w910i, don't buy it yet, wait until it gets cheaper, and also get some bugs (if any) fixed =).
) s  H7 ], \8 C$ a8 G" q" h; _: ^公仔箱論壇' i0 _' O: R4 Q
In the end, it depends on which one you think is better or looks better lor, since they are both good =).
作者: wlt1110    時間: 2007-11-7 08:08 PM

w910..got 3G
作者: emiri2611    時間: 2007-11-20 03:49 PM

w910   got better functions and its has 3G :onion05:
作者: green_lemon    時間: 2007-11-20 10:22 PM

Putting the W910i up against the W580i can make some sense, since these two will be considered as almost identical solutions in terms offunctionality (at least at a glance) and might well end up on the sameshort list.公仔箱論壇6 A# }& c" C  |2 _
$ q3 q" V8 z( ?8 _
Sony Ericsson W910i Sony Ericsson W580i
Size, weight 99.5x50x12.5    mm, 86 grams 99x47x14 mm, 94 grams
Display 2.36 inches,    QVGA, TFT, 262K 2 inches, QVGA, TFT, 262K
Motion sensor Games, music, camera Games, music, sporty features (pedometer)
Software platform A200, JP-8 A100, JP-7
Battery BST-39, 920 mAh, Li-Ion         BST-38, 930 mAh, Li-Pol
Walkman version 3.0 2.0
Shake Control Three actions Shuffle only
Windows Media support Yes (plus DRM 2.0) Yes
Media section Yes No
Camera 2 Mpix, CMOS, no autofocus 2 Mpix, CMOS, no autofocus

作者: jikinhi    時間: 2007-11-21 05:14 AM

W580 nice
作者: ting_e_lu    時間: 2007-11-24 12:36 PM

我老豆用緊w580
8 T# w2 j% p) q公仔箱論壇幾好
作者: uduki    時間: 2007-11-30 03:10 AM

我個fd都用緊w580公仔箱論壇5 E1 L  ^" o; h% S
除左3g 其他都ok
作者: d5798    時間: 2007-12-1 11:00 PM

hey, stupid guys.who dont know a better phone has a more expensive price,use your brain a! but i prefer 580公仔箱論壇( |* A1 a$ ?$ [7 \3 M. B/ j6 U4 m& a
5.39.217.77:8898! H2 v$ x* L0 e2 W9 i$ q, L

9 f. l5 _- a9 y& k) {1 k) z" ~/ N  w8 O3 N5 t
2. 嚴禁對任何會員作出辱罵,粗言穢語或引起罵戰等行為,違者將會被删帖或扣除積分/功勳!
% M+ n( V" s( L% b  B

8 _& D* f8 C; x1 y公仔箱論壇[ 本帖最後由 julianneteng 於 2007-12-1 11:09 PM 編輯 ]
作者: lstai    時間: 2007-12-2 06:37 PM

both of them has not auto-focus ...
作者: wkn1ght93    時間: 2007-12-4 10:10 AM

of course is w910 loh
作者: hello123456    時間: 2007-12-7 07:22 PM     標題: 回復 #1 老弟 的帖子

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: kelvinleong    時間: 2007-12-12 05:06 PM

i w910
作者: weish    時間: 2007-12-18 08:27 PM

overall w580 design better and cheaper lo...but keypad crack like hell...
0 {2 z5 D- B5 p' W6 U5.39.217.77:8898w910 more expensive...but the price will drop soon...
作者: miko_112233    時間: 2008-7-25 09:31 PM

They both shit+ s( n  j; a3 m, }: N7 M
i have the W910i, its system is too slow respond...公仔箱論壇4 M6 Z$ J! m( i/ `) ^# n6 {0 V
also the battery can not be used long...5.39.217.77:8898/ y, J* @- \5 R! |3 V" l' I% Y

% D' W; F+ m7 \2 W" ]# r* U, Z公仔箱論壇dont waste money buy others...
作者: lawrencechuah    時間: 2008-10-2 01:07 AM

w910i got 3g. more batter compare to w580.
作者: 尛滊靤    時間: 2008-11-7 01:53 PM

w910我用緊覺得唔錯




歡迎光臨 公仔箱論壇 (http://5.39.217.77:8898/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0