. m, a+ v" V9 K6 ~! P5.39.217.77:8898納瓦羅教授接著列舉了中國的不公平以及非法的貿易做法，其中包括貿易補貼、明目張膽地盜竊美國的技術和商業機密，偽造美國名牌産品，操縱貨幣匯率，強迫希望在中國營業或銷售的美國公司轉讓技術，等等。 ' e9 \, N( s5 H/ g1 l公仔箱論壇. L# k; {" L8 b) d, e
納瓦羅教授接著寫道，“除此之外，中國共産黨目光短淺得令人難以置信，願意以巨大的環境破壞和大量的工作場所傷亡來換取一丁點生産成本的節省，而做到這一切的原因就是極為鬆懈的行業管制規則。例如，據世界衛生組織報告，空氣污染每年造成將近70萬中國人死亡，相當於每年美國懷俄明州的人口全部死光。與此同時，中國官員承認，每年死於煤礦礦難的人有2000多人，而美國只有50多人。”tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb: g$ F7 M9 e. e( `' L
TVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。7 k# a! x: }: o! d0 V
“事情很清楚。（中國用來佔美國上風的）所有這一切實實在在的經濟武器導致美國成千上萬的工廠關閉，導致美國成百萬的工人失業。而這一切都是在自由貿易的虛假旗號下進行的。” $ N& Z. e) U; B2 J1 g f0 v" z5 H; V' t; {公仔箱論壇5.39.217.77:8898# F1 R( m* u! f5 ?: t
以上是美國各地主要媒體有關中國的評論。評論所反映的觀點為發表評論媒體之觀點，並不一定代表美國之音的觀點。 0 k' G9 q5 n8 I- }7 u$ LTVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。5.39.217.77:8898- e- u) u# q2 D8 t
TVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。! v* `2 a$ [1 q
來源 / 版權所有： 以上所述媒体 / 德国之声TVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。# k3 ~& a4 v- T5 ]
(以上内容摘自或摘译自 其它媒体，不代表發帖者观点)5.39.217.77:88988 K& W4 `+ Z N2 |
公仔箱論壇; b9 c: d# l5 W( r- e. [( I 註：上文引述有關媒體全文轉貼於樓下作者: aa00 時間: 2011-6-26 10:20 AM
本帖最後由 aa00 於 2011-6-26 10:22 AM 編輯 7 a% F# N M7 G( f3 \4 H( a% KTVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb# h5 Z. R+ @, t p5 k
How China unfairly bests the U.S. China's manufacturing advantage over the U.S. is actually due to a complex array of unfair trade practices, all of which are illegal under free-trade rules.公仔箱論壇/ p" P; Y* J: k) f* e
. X8 @, n3 e6 r7 c4 U1 m 6 b" T- h& Q- t; E! |3 R2 _5.39.217.77:88982 _/ q8 T6 u) F6 k
June 21, 2011|By Peter Navarro 4 T* E. b& z% b) U; S- {8 N) Z" W公仔箱論壇 " C4 N( u* H' Etvb now,tvbnow,bttvb/ H' }; I7 X& L" _, D2 N7 x
The American economy has been in trouble for more than a decade, and no amount of right-wing tax cuts or left-wing fiscal stimuli will solve the primary structural problem underpinning our slow growth and high unemployment. That problem is a massive, persistent trade deficit — most of it with China — that cuts the number of jobs created by nearly the number we need to keep America fully employed.TVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。4 w, Y* V. `9 i. S0 u& w
, d, [4 }) H3 P$ X' l- lTVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。 + U1 [3 Z9 A: k! f9 p" r' k# Y! ~( }5.39.217.77:8898To understand why huge U.S. trade deficits represent the taproot of the nation's economic woes, it's crucial to understand that four factors drive our gross domestic product: consumption, business investment, government spending and net exports. This discussion focuses on net exports. 7 W( g1 R* r7 R0 L公仔箱論壇Net exports represent the difference between how much we export and import. A trade deficit means net exports are negative, and that directly reduces both the GDP growth rate and rate of job creation.5.39.217.77:88982 O- A# J; y3 g, K( R; D3 ?/ @
, w) u+ o0 s) |8 _tvb now,tvbnow,bttvbAmerica's trade deficit is costing us close to 1% of GDP growth a year at a loss of almost 1 million jobs annually. That's millions of jobs we have failed to create over the last decade; and if we had those jobs now, we wouldn't see continuing high unemployment numbers, padlocked houses under foreclosure and empty factories pushing up weeds. * |) f- x9 U. ^3 J5 ETVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。 ; k, t& Y* Y9 g: R8 U5.39.217.77:8898It follows that if we want to get America back to work, we need to sharply reduce our trade deficit. As a statistical matter, that means sharply reducing our trade deficit with China. ; q$ |+ Z. S$ U( A5 R) ?tvb now,tvbnow,bttvbtvb now,tvbnow,bttvb+ B b* J0 E6 j K1 u; {- k
Every business day, American consumers buy $1 billion more in Chinese exports than American manufacturers sell to China, and China alone accounts for about 70% of America's trade deficit in goods, excluding oil imports. This "Chinese import dependence" has led a democratic America to owe the largest communist nation in the world more than $1 trillion, while China holds more than $3 trillion in foreign reserves, most of them in U.S. dollars. 4 Y$ k3 _: L& ^5.39.217.77:8898tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb0 @' r$ M3 ~2 S }! i4 [
To put these dollar reserves in perspective, that's more than enough money for China to buy a controlling interest in every major company in the Dow Jones Industrial Average, including Alcoa, Caterpillar, Exxon Mobil and Wal-Mart, and still leave billions to spare. 9 c9 c4 f1 p: ] ! t. u1 d* { m; z公仔箱論壇So how can we eliminate, or at least drastically reduce, our trade deficit with China? For starters, we must puncture the myth that China's main manufacturing edge is solely its cheap labor. Indeed, while low labor costs are a factor, when you carefully research the biggest source of China's manufacturing advantage, it is actually a complex array of unfair trade practices, all of which are illegal under free-trade rules.: V: r& H) i$ p- T- x
9 `1 ~0 r$ e: v y/ H+ @% `; etvb now,tvbnow,bttvbThe most potent of China's "weapons of job destruction" are an elaborate web of export subsidies; the blatant piracy of America's technologies and trade secrets; the counterfeiting of valuable brand names like Nike and Chevy; a cleverly manipulated and grossly undervalued currency; and the forced transfer of the technology of any American company wishing to operate on Chinese soil or sell into the Chinese market.tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb8 L0 F, z# J' k: N
r/ M9 g- Q) V4 l' i公仔箱論壇Each of these unfair trade practices is expressly prohibited both by World Trade Organization rules as well as rules established by the U.S. government, e.g., the Treasury Department has sanctions against currency manipulation (which, alas, the Obama administration refuses to use against China despite campaign promises to do so). # Q5 k' u" O5 q- w: r1 d , s) b" r1 a( t ^' B( t, `5.39.217.77:8898tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb. C# J$ @6 \; a
In addition, there is the Chinese Communist Party's incredibly shortsighted willingness to trade tremendous environmental damage and a surfeit of workplace deaths and injuries for a few more pennies of production cost advantage, all because of ultra-lax regulatory standards. For example, according to the World Health Organization, almost 700,000 Chinese citizens die annually from the effects of air pollution — that's like losing everybody in Wyoming every year — while Chinese officials acknowledge more than 2,000 coal mining deaths annually, compared with fewer than 50 in the United States. ) R$ H) [) g: L! F+ V! x- G % \" Z2 X/ v4 R6 X# STVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。Make no mistake. All of these real economic weapons have led to the shutdown of thousands of American factories and turned millions of American workers into collateral damage, all under the false flag of so-called free trade.0 r4 G$ X) r0 C4 L& t% [8 E g
% f+ u# d3 u( @7 A3 H
The second myth we must expose if we are to ever reverse the job-killing trade deficits we now run with China is the idea that free trade always benefits both countries. That doesn't hold true if one country cheats on the other. Instead, when a mercantilist China uses unfair trade practices to wage war on our manufacturing base, the American economy is the big loser. / f4 U+ |! Z; t公仔箱論壇 4 w; b3 j' j& j+ c7 q! Gtvb now,tvbnow,bttvbGiven America's structural problem with China and absent constructive trade reform, our economic prospects can only dim further. The presidential candidate who grasps that essential truth, which is becoming increasingly understood by much of the electorate, will be the one who wins in 2012. We need someone who can lead this country to a trade relationship with China founded on the American ideals of free and fair trade rather than a set of mercantilist and socialist trade policies that employ the Chinese masses at the expense of American workers.公仔箱論壇5 K! P1 o* g2 S! F
3 m) Y5 a+ n, q* E wPeter Navarro is a business professor at UC Irvine, a CNBC contributor and the coauthor with Greg Autry of "Death by China: Confronting the Dragon — A Global Call to Action."tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb2 J% G; t8 O; s1 b0 c& v9 P- i6 Q
tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb# I2 V2 _+ C S) v l; k l8 {
tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb8 B" D6 r! ]4 c3 |; K) o6 L
) b" U$ k/ O: m! g- T5.39.217.77:8898來源 / 版權所有： Los Angeles Times公仔箱論壇1 m1 c6 i+ Q K* K
(以上内容摘自或摘译自 Los Angeles Times，不代表發帖者观点)作者: diandeng 時間: 2011-6-26 02:58 PM
