利害,點都估唔到個編劇真係咁都得~~圓圓死於意外~~7 A" L' Q6 n. @) ~, T
老豆出0黎做證講2句再加law 霸講多2句就判意外~~我睇完仲意外~~ & W" H. e0 G. E- ]" G# J& b
仲有法證都搵唔到ge玻璃,一個係林師奶就搵到~~有0的兒嬉囉~~作者: momo2010020 時間: 2011-6-14 01:36 PM
yea. i was disappointed at that part too( ^& D7 f6 ] Y
how can it be an accident?: p3 {1 `+ m' @% o8 q0 q4 g
that piece of glass was accerlated so strongly that it can kill? 8 W8 p9 A: N3 [2 i `( J0 u/ L: Peven Kevin's experiment failed作者: cheerful12 時間: 2011-6-16 12:10 PM
yea. i was disappointed at that part too / ~; L: M6 E8 N H0 M5.39.217.77:8898how can it be an accident? ! S& G* c3 ]# e7 U4 B R" k8 l+ P% b% [tvb now,tvbnow,bttvbthat piece of glass was accerlated so strongly that it can kill? $ S& ?1 o2 H3 Btvb now,tvbnow,bttvbeven Kevin's experiment failed作者: justinsong 時間: 2011-6-16 04:06 PM
呢度剧本唔通作者: edwinhiht 時間: 2011-6-18 01:02 AM
聽古唔好駁古..但我都頂唔住, 咁都作得出,跌落街都易合理d啦作者: buzz21 時間: 2011-6-18 01:04 AM
唉....故仔真係故仔... 咩都由佢講作者: bbtang47 時間: 2011-6-18 01:43 AM
everyone here is very pro..作者: ava7 時間: 2011-6-24 08:36 PM
yes..i dont agree that作者: lightpink 時間: 2011-6-24 09:04 PM
係咯,係咯作者: mrfusion 時間: 2011-6-24 10:11 PM
for the glass fragment to strike her, the glass has to be smash at a precise speed and precise angle with a precise orientation, and possibly if the glass has any pre-existing defect. 8 Y, Y2 C- z% D5 U& z$ _公仔箱論壇5.39.217.77:8898! K& y4 j+ E# M* ]
the possibiolity is endless which will make it impossible to repeat the experiment.