返回列表 回復 發帖

飛機師 Vs 飛機工程師

唔知點解劇中講到 飛機維修 好似做地盤一樣?- }# S" X" Z# B# E( k
) V+ q) l- d2 V% U3 S- ^) V
就算做到飛機工程師都係一樣!# ~+ e! w6 Y. N; N# V
7 k+ [& Y5 B) I) J) }) W
雖然物理上真係一個在天、一個在地。
真的。。。不解释了
事實係咁
- z+ i4 s6 V3 k) L0 Q我十年前都差D去左做維修員% i: x( c2 t! Y
同做文員差唔多個價 中三就做到
really? i thought you need a university degree
飛機師人工高D
做維修只是技工,叫工程師只是好聽
如果做到夏晨這個位有三萬五至四萬人工,照哥是工程師有4萬至4萬5人工。屬於專業人事。
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
totally agree
They are not engineer, they are mechanics, like a car mechanics you see in the garage. tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb9 E0 Q2 R# F) Y& }( U1 c

: u/ [9 j" [" \' BEngineer actually need to create/build something. Plane Engineer build/design planes, what these people in the drama does are just mechanics, they repairs and replace planes.
& ^- |5 X; w* e9 {* X. p1 ?! I公仔箱論壇5.39.217.77:8898: a- q  q% n/ Y2 Z, f
Engineer wrote plane instruction manuals, 夏晨's mechanic team read and follow it.
aircraft engineering isn't that good of a job in hk.. specially the paid, on the other hand, pilots as second officer earn more than being an licensed engineer.. and free sandwiches too so=sandwich eaters
Pilot's salary always is better...
我認為維修的只應該稱技工,設計製造的才可叫工程師,
呢個世界係咁架啦, PILOT 係最巴閉~
飛機師當然是人工好啦...要講天份的.....
返回列表