this is call "movie" ... if real happen that is not movie ... 5.39.217.774 ~" W$ E" g5 v
further just want to tell you the accident happen only ... }( d, Q3 \$ I
maybe the cutting and animation is not so pro only ....tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb# D9 ]" D. N; l& Y
jojo8 發表於 2011-8-4 09:32 AM 
5.39.217.771 M3 j8 ?$ ]$ k! e; y7 C H
Err... no,
+ c; F- }/ F _# C5.39.217.77
. g, @3 m6 R/ @* R* s/ z! U5.39.217.77It's called "television" in case you couldn't tell them apart. . f( \% @! h8 F# Z& V* V
5 N* O; A; ] d& b1 [ E- f0 f"Movies" involve film, GENERALLY run for about 90-120 minutes give or take, and on first screening you'd normally need to pay to see them, and are not syndicated across tv networks and don't come in 25 episodes running for 5 consecutive weeks... % ~$ @9 c2 @+ U
5.39.217.77; E2 S$ e7 d6 A3 ~7 s4 {7 ~
Good to learn something new eh? :Ptvb now,tvbnow,bttvb6 g) ^% F$ g! u$ ?" G0 s1 U
tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb- B/ b$ A6 h- G% b1 y
Seriously though - just because they've started using CGI doesn't mean it has to be less convincing. 15-20 years ago, they would've used a stunt double, a stunt driver and a scrap car from the junkyard (that's why you can always tell the main character is about to have a car crash when s/he gets into a shit car all of a sudden) - using CGI means you can use any car, there's no danger to the actor and there's no extra expense in hiring stuntmen, but that doesn't mean they can do a shit job at CGI |
發表於 2011-8-3 03:15 AM
| 
發表於 2011-8-3 04:02 PM
| 
