l0709394

1=5 already violates the basic arithmatics,
% }; W3 ]3 m. |' f. Btvb now,tvbnow,bttvbwithout the basic arithmatics, we can not even say 5=1 because we dont know if = sign is commutative, therefore, 5=3125 is an answer that follows the pattern well% R& X- x0 e) I. Z; G. I
+ ~6 ^, }( _4 l' [& L
anyway, what is more important is the lessen behind this question