1=5 already violates the basic arithmatics,
8 @7 G$ e6 A- u' _; q0 |9 G7 w/ ptvb now,tvbnow,bttvbwithout the basic arithmatics, we can not even say 5=1 because we dont know if = sign is commutative, therefore, 5=3125 is an answer that follows the pattern well
% ~% m5 Q$ L; |/ f" J( M
d' ?" V, G9 F( ?( R& Q, }公仔箱論壇anyway, what is more important is the lessen behind this question |
發表於 2007-4-9 03:39 PM
| 