返回列表 回復 發帖
1=5 already violates the basic arithmatics,5.39.217.77- h& @) y$ L! c1 i7 Z. ~! R6 ~
without the basic arithmatics, we can not even say 5=1 because we dont know if = sign is commutative, therefore, 5=3125 is an answer that follows the pattern well
9 V3 T; }( T1 J2 d) J4 U- N- Otvb now,tvbnow,bttvb
8 v' `) x* R$ R) `tvb now,tvbnow,bttvbanyway, what is more important is the lessen behind this question
返回列表