Board logo

標題: 飛機師 Vs 飛機工程師 [打印本頁]
作者: moonlight1812    時間: 2013-8-9 10:00 PM     標題: 飛機師 Vs 飛機工程師

唔知點解劇中講到 飛機維修 好似做地盤一樣？
: }7 w. H  h% Z4 m& O
' [9 E8 p( ?8 z- Q" B& B/ R  X2 p就算做到飛機工程師都係一樣！tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb- n0 M8 j9 F& q) X# n# d5 ^! `1 ~2 W

/ _1 k& R* N" K; i1 o7 \, btvb now,tvbnow,bttvb雖然物理上真係一個在天、一個在地。
作者: tedlost    時間: 2013-8-12 01:05 AM

真的。。。不解释了
作者: bugbear1945    時間: 2013-8-12 09:37 PM

事實係咁
# l: V8 n% d4 ~. p) ~7 Rtvb now,tvbnow,bttvb我十年前都差D去左做維修員( ?  [2 A: K& E7 F8 |$ L& e
同做文員差唔多個價 中三就做到
作者: 屁屁zzz    時間: 2013-8-13 08:21 PM

really? i thought you need a university degree
作者: yy66    時間: 2013-8-14 10:49 AM

飛機師人工高D
作者: mg005    時間: 2013-8-14 10:51 AM

做維修只是技工,叫工程師只是好聽
作者: milito    時間: 2013-8-14 07:16 PM

如果做到夏晨這個位有三萬五至四萬人工，照哥是工程師有4萬至4萬5人工。屬於專業人事。
作者: colourbeast    時間: 2013-8-15 09:16 AM

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: garciabox    時間: 2013-8-18 05:29 PM

totally agree
作者: mrfusion    時間: 2013-8-18 06:01 PM

They are not engineer, they are mechanics, like a car mechanics you see in the garage. 公仔箱論壇0 i: b# D; y; m

. t% D& Y( L& Z  W公仔箱論壇Engineer actually need to create/build something. Plane Engineer build/design planes, what these people in the drama does are just mechanics, they repairs and replace planes.
! ~: r( `! u% v9 S: M8 s0 e* O3 dtvb now,tvbnow,bttvb
" W6 M0 g+ k( P5 ktvb now,tvbnow,bttvbEngineer wrote plane instruction manuals, 夏晨's mechanic team read and follow it.
作者: flight55    時間: 2013-8-18 06:24 PM

aircraft engineering isn't that good of a job in hk.. specially the paid, on the other hand, pilots as second officer earn more than being an licensed engineer.. and free sandwiches too so=sandwich eaters
作者: ongong84    時間: 2013-8-19 11:19 AM

Pilot's salary always is better...
作者: mg005    時間: 2013-8-19 11:27 AM

我認為維修的只應該稱技工,設計製造的才可叫工程師,
作者: riverchild    時間: 2013-8-22 03:06 PM

呢個世界係咁架啦, PILOT 係最巴閉~
作者: simonkok    時間: 2013-8-23 05:30 PM

飛機師當然是人工好啦...要講天份的.....
作者: kitkit1989    時間: 2013-8-24 04:56 PM

飛機師當然是高尚D~(特別係香港)
作者: pcmiow    時間: 2013-8-28 09:57 PM

止不过是制服的问题
作者: wan.ming    時間: 2013-8-28 10:26 PM

飛機師當然是人工比飛機工程師好好多
作者: goonerwong1927    時間: 2013-8-29 12:27 AM

Pilots have a shorter active working life whereas mechanics might be able to carry on for longer.
作者: 鬼虎    時間: 2013-8-29 11:54 PM

我都係工程師. 咪又係做到好似做地盤咁.....
作者: mrfusion    時間: 2013-8-31 12:04 PM

Pilots have a shorter active working life whereas mechanics might be able to carry on for longer.* ^( X0 ?% V, y7 d
goonerwong1927 發表於 2013-8-29 12:27 AM
, ]" ~5 @+ N1 g( j' M! S; mWhat are you talking about, unless a pilot developed serious health issues, pilot can work till they are 60 or 65, maybe longer.5.39.217.770 {1 W$ @1 [9 H. B

0 x) ~  `' j7 A" T5 B" E: U5.39.217.77Sam and Tony in the series is acting as 45+.公仔箱論壇6 `8 V  o) b% v* E& s* p
5.39.217.779 U# s% @2 ?. V! U# t
Taylor (駱應鈞) in the first series is also have to be about 50, and is still going strong.
! w0 Y; ?- P, s6 a4 q* c
7 v1 ~$ A. }- I$ J. EWhereas a aircraft maintenance technician is a very strength demanding job, the shortage of staff in the field mean most will work long hours and likely to be injured from time to time, and may no longer be suitable by about 50.
作者: HarleyGold    時間: 2013-8-31 01:15 PM

飛機師難做d
作者: okx321    時間: 2013-9-1 12:34 AM

现实系甘样架啦
作者: carcar88    時間: 2013-9-1 01:34 PM

Pilot's salary always is better..x2
作者: rice888    時間: 2013-9-1 02:24 PM

真的。。。不解释了公仔箱論壇: g; W6 F( p# o8 [) H
tedlost 發表於 2013-8-12 01:05 AM
/ ]% Z" }6 W* h/ N! J  t$ e6 Zpls explain ...
作者: chacha610    時間: 2013-9-1 06:02 PM

行行出狀元
作者: beyond4    時間: 2013-9-13 08:03 AM

thanks for sharing
作者: lucy105    時間: 2013-9-14 03:33 PM

就係睇件制服都系飛機師型D啦
作者: andypanghk1021    時間: 2013-9-16 01:58 AM

飛機師有冷氣嘆.唔洗咁大汗嘛
作者: racing_ken    時間: 2013-9-23 11:43 AM

機師吸引D
作者: ekincheang    時間: 2013-10-6 10:30 PM

政府文員,辦公室文員,地盤文員....都係文員!!!
作者: ekincheang    時間: 2013-10-6 10:30 PM

政府文員,辦公室文員,地盤文員....都係文員!!!
作者: ekincheang    時間: 2013-10-6 10:30 PM

政府文員,辦公室文員,地盤文員....都係文員!!!  但要求不同..



歡迎光臨 公仔箱論壇 (http://5.39.217.77/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0